3.8 Article

Effect of lowering dietary crude protein on nitrogen excretion, manure composition and ammonia emission from fattening pigs

期刊

LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE
卷 91, 期 1-2, 页码 45-55

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.06.013

关键词

pig; protein content; slurry; N excretion; ammonia emission; land application

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of three strategies of protein feeding (12%, 16% and 20%), supplying adequate levels of all essential amino acids, on finishing pig performance, nitrogen excretion and ammonia emission in the laboratory and in the field. The animals (15 castrated males) were housed individually in metabolism cages and were fed one of the three diets. The experiment lasted 21 days and urine and faeces were collected separately. Samples of each type of manure (urine alone, fresh slurry and 18-day slurry) were placed for 6 days in a laboratory pilot scale system designed to measure ammonia emission. In the field, measurements of ammonia volatilization were made during storage and surface application of slurry. Lowering dietary crude protein, while maintaining similar levels of essential amino acids, reduced total amount of manure, because of a lower water consumption, without any negative effect on animal performance. Total ammoniacal nitrogen content in the slurry was reduced from 4.32 g N kg(-1) to 3.13 and 1.92 g N kg(-1) when dietary CP decreased from 20% to 16% and 12%, respectively (the corresponding figures for total nitrogen content were 5.48, 4.30 and 3.05 g N kg(-1), respectively). The pH of slurry decreased by 1.3 units when dietary crude protein decreased from 20% to 12%. These changes in slurry composition and pH resulted in a reduction of ammonia emissions at each stage of manure management. Over the whole process of the slurry, ammonia emission was decreased by 63% when dietary protein decreased from 20% to 12%. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据