4.2 Review

Role of neurosteroids in catamenial epilepsy

期刊

EPILEPSY RESEARCH
卷 62, 期 2-3, 页码 99-118

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2004.09.003

关键词

neurosteroid; GABA(A) receptor; progesterone; ganaxolone; catamenial epilepsy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Catamenial epilepsy is a menstrual cycle-related seizure disorder that affects up to 70% of women with epilepsy. Catamenial epilepsy is characterized by an increase in seizures during particular phases of the menstrual cycle. Three distinct patterns of catamenial epilepsy - perimenstrual, periovulatory, and inadequate luteal phase - have been described. Currently, there is no specific treatment for catamenial epilepsy. The molecular mechanisms involved in the pathophysiology of catamenial epilepsy are not well understood. Recent studies suggest that cyclical changes of ovarian hormones estrogens (proconvulsant) and progesterone (anticonvulsant) appear to play a key role in the genesis of catamenial seizures. Progesterone reduces seizure susceptibility partly through conversion to neurosteroids such as allopregnanolone, which enhances GABA(A) receptor function and thereby inhibits neuronal excitability. In animal models, withdrawal from chronic progesterone and, consequently, of allopregnanolone levels in brain, has been shown to increase seizure susceptibility. Natural progesterone therapy has proven effective in women with epilepsy. Moreover, neurosteroids have been shown to be very effective inhibitors of catamenial seizures in animal models. Thus, synthetic neuroactive steroids, such as ganaxolone, which are orally active and devoid of hormonal side effects, represent a novel treatment strategy for catamenial epilepsy. However, their clinical efficacy in catamenial epilepsy has yet to be explored. A greater understanding of the molecular mechanisms is clearly needed for designing effective treatment and prevention strategies of catamenial epilepsy in women at risk. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据