4.5 Article

Single-cell imaging of intracellular Ca2+ and phospholipase C activity reveals that RGS 2, 3, and 4 differentially regulate signaling via the Gαq/11-linked muscarinic M3 receptor

期刊

MOLECULAR PHARMACOLOGY
卷 66, 期 6, 页码 1453-1464

出版社

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/mol.104.005827

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using single cell, real-time imaging, this study compared the impact of members of the B/R4 subfamily of the regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) (RGS2, -3, and -4) on receptor-mediated inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate [Ins(1,4,5)P-3], diacylglycerol, and Ca2+ signaling. In human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells expressing recombinant Galpha(q/11)-coupled muscarinic M-3 receptors, transient coexpression of RGS proteins with fluorescently-tagged biosensors for either Ins(1,4,5)P-3 or diacylglycerol demonstrated that RGS2 and 3 inhibited receptor-mediated events. Although gross indices of signaling were unaffected by RGS4, it slowed the rate of increase in Ins(1,4,5)P-3 levels. At equivalent levels of expression, myc-tagged RGS proteins showed inhibitory activity on the order RGS3greater than or equal toRGS2>RGS4. In HEK293 cells, stable expression of myc-tagged RGS2, -3, or -4 at equivalent levels also inhibited phosphoinositide and Ca2+ signaling by endogenously expressed muscarinic M-3 receptors in the order GS3greater than or equal toRGS2>RGS4. In these cells, RGS2 or -3 reduced receptor-mediated inositol phosphate generation in cell populations and reduced both the magnitude and kinetics (rise-time) of single cell Ca2+ signals. Furthermore, at low levels of receptor activation, oscillatory Ca2+ signals were dampened or abolished, whereas at higher levels, RGS2 and -3 promoted the conversion of more stable Ca2+ elevations into oscillatory signals. Despite little or no effect on responses to maximal receptor activation, RGS4 produced effects on the magnitude, kinetics, and oscillatory behavior of Ca2+ signaling at submaximal levels that were consistent with those of RGS2 and -3.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据