4.6 Article

Retrospective analysis of weekly topotecan as salvage therapy in relapsed ovarian cancer

期刊

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
卷 95, 期 3, 页码 564-569

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.08.026

关键词

alternate treatment regimens; ovarian cancer; relapsed ovarian cancer; retrospective analysis; topotecan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To retrospectively investigate the safety and efficacy of weekly topotecan in heavily pretreated patients with ovarian cancer. Methods. Data were collected by retrospective review of patient records. Eligible patients had received greater than or equal to2 prior regimens for ovarian cancer before treatment with weekly topotecan. Efficacy was determined by measurable disease or CA 125 levels. Adverse event and growth factor support data were also collected. Results. Fifty patients (median age, 61 years) were evaluable for safety and received a total of 244 4-week cycles of therapy (median, 3; range, 1-21 cycles). Most patients (84%) had measurable disease, and 30% had performance status of greater than or equal to2. Patients had received two to six prior treatments for ovarian cancer. Median weekly dose per patient was topotecan 3.7 mg/m(2). Grade 4 hematologic toxicities (generally manageable) occurred in 4% of patients. One patient had febrile neutropenia. Grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities were fatigue in two (4%) patients. Forty-two patients were evaluable for response. Of 35 evaluable patients with measurable disease, 11 (31%) had a partial response (median duration, 3 months), and 15 (43%) patients had stable disease (median duration, 3.5 months). Of 41 evaluable patients with elevated CA 125 (median, 154 U/l; range, 47-7200 U/l), 11 (27%) had greater than or equal to50% decreases or normalization of CA 125 levels. Median time to progression in all patients with stable disease has not been reached (follow-up range, 1.5-17.3 months). Conclusions. Weekly topotecan is active and well tolerated in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed ovarian cancer. Prospective studies of this regimen are warranted. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据