4.7 Article

Decreased plasma lipoprotein lipase in hypoadiponectinemia - An association independent of ststemic inflammation and insulin resistance

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 27, 期 12, 页码 2925-2929

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/diacare.27.12.2925

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK07296-23] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE - Adiponectin is a plasma protein expressed in adipose tissue. Hypoadiponectinemia is associated with low HDL cholesterol and high plasma triglycerides, which also characterize lipoprotein lipase (LPL) deficiency syndromes. Recently, dramatically increased LPL activity was reported in mice overexpressing adiponectin. We therefore speculated that adiponectin may directly affect LPL in humans. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - We measured plasma adiponectin and post-heparin LPL in 206 nondiabetic men and in a second group of 110 patients with type 2 diabetes. Parameters were correlated with markets of systemic inflammation (C-reactive protein [CRP]) and insulin resistance (homeostatis model assessment of insulin resistance [HOMA-IR]). RESULTS - Nondiabetic subjects with decreased plasma adiponectin had lower LPL activity (r = 0.42, P < 0.0001). This association of plasma adiponectin with LPL activity was confirmed in the second group of patients with type 2 diabetes (r = 0.37, P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that adiponectin was the strongest factor influencing LPL activity, accounting for 23% of the variation in LPL activity In nondiabetic Subjects and for 26% of the variation in LPL activity in type 2 diabetic patients. These associations were independent of plasma CRP and HOMA-IR. CONCLUSIONS - These results demonstrate an association of decreased postheparin LPL activity with low plasma adiponectin that is independent of systemic inflammation and insulin resistance. therefore, LPL may represent a link between low adiponectin levels and dyslipidemia in both nondiabetic individuals and patients with type 2 diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据