4.7 Article

Loss of redness (a*) as a tool to follow hemoglobin-mediated lipid oxidation in washed cod mince

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 52, 期 24, 页码 7214-7221

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf0307907

关键词

redness; a*; lipid oxidation; cod; hemoglobin; TBARS; Hb

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Instrumental measurement of redness loss (decrease in a(*) value) was evaluated as a tool to follow hemoglobin (Hb)-mediated lipid oxidation in fish muscle. Two washed cod mince model systems were used (prepared at pH 6.5 and 5.5), both fortified with 15,mumol/kg of trout Hb and adjusted to pH 6.5 and 81% moisture. The rate of oxidation was varied through pH alterations (pH 6.1 and 6.9) and addition of an antioxiclative cod muscle press juice. During ice storage, TBARS, painty odor, and a(*) values were followed. In all oxidizing samples, a(*) values correlated well with TBARS and painty odor development; r = -0.95 and -0.77, respectively. In press juice containing samples, the correlation was lower (0.55 for a(*) vs TBARS) because there was a slight a(*) value decrease even in the absence of measurable lipid oxidation. a(*) values distinguished between oxidizing and stable samples within 1 day, before any lipid oxidation products could be chemically detected. It was confirmed in an aqueous phosphate buffer model system that the redness loss corresponded to a buildup of brownish met-Hb at the expense of oxy- and deoxy-Hb. The a(*) value data were best used as a lipid oxidation index by calculating the rate of decrease (k value) in the initial phase of the redness loss (before accumulation of lipid oxidation products) or in the differentiation phase (during the exponential raise in TBARS/painty odor). Calibration to lipid oxidation products must, however, be made for each specific sample type. Washing method, pH, Hb-type, etc., all affected both k values and absolute a* readings. Small yellowness (b(*)) increases also occurred along with a(*) value losses, possibly the result of polymerized Schiff bases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据