4.6 Article

An empirical algorithm for broadband photometric redshifts of quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES
卷 155, 期 2, 页码 243-256

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/425355

关键词

galaxies : distances and redshifts; galaxies : photometry; methods : statistical; quasars : general

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present an empirical algorithm for obtaining photometric redshifts of quasars using five-band Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) photometry. Our algorithm generates an empirical model of the quasar color-redshift relation, compares the colors of a quasar candidate with this model, and calculates possible photometric redshifts. Using the 3814 quasars of the SDSS Early Data Release (EDR) Quasar Catalog to generate a median color-redshift relation as a function of redshift we find that, for this same sample, 83% of our predicted redshifts are correct to within \Deltaz\ < 0.3. The algorithm also determines the probability that the redshift is correct, allowing for even more robust photometric redshift determination for smaller, more restricted samples. We apply this technique to a set of 8740 quasar candidates selected by the final version of the SDSS quasar-selection algorithm. The photometric redshifts assigned to nonquasars are restricted to a few well-defined values. In addition, 90% of the objects with spectra that have photometric redshifts between 0.8 and 2.2 are quasars with accurate (\Δz\ < 0.3) photometric redshifts. Many of these quasars lie in a single region of color space; judicious application of color-cuts can effectively select quasars with accurate photometric redshifts from the SDSS database - without reference to the SDSS quasar selection algorithm. When the SDSS is complete, this technique will allow the determination of photometric redshifts for similar to 10(6) faint SDSS quasar candidates, enabling advances in our knowledge of the quasar luminosity function, gravitational lensing of quasars, and correlations among quasars and between galaxies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据