4.5 Article

Analysis of poly(ethylene glycol)-diacrylate macromer polymerization within a multicomponent semi-interpenetrating polymer network system

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.30179

关键词

hydrogels; poly(ethylene glycol)-diacrylate; attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR); photopolymerization; conversion

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-77825] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIBIB NIH HHS [EB-00290] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Semi-interpenetrating polymer networks (semi-IPNs) containing poly(ethylene glycol)-diacrylate (PEGdA) and modified gelatin were prepared with 2,2-dimethoxy-2-phenylacetophenone (DMPA) as a photoinitiator. The effect of (i) initiator and PEGdA concentration, and (ii) weight ratio and type of modified gelatin on the conversion of PEGdA functional end groups was monitored in situ using attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR). Reaction induction time was dependent on DMPA concentration and increased with decreasing DMPA concentration. Relative reaction rate was strongly dependent on both DMPA and PEGdA concentrations. Gelatin weight ratio and modification did not significantly affect reaction induction time, relative reaction rate, or reaction end time. Swelling/degradation kinetics at various aqueous conditions sought to establish relationships between diacrylate conversion and the resulting semi-IPN physical properties. Semi-IPN swelling weight ratio was strongly dependent on solvent conditions and semi-IPN exposure to gamma-irradiation. Gelatin backbone modification and UV exposure time exhibited no effect on semi-IPN swelling weight ratio. In conclusion, ATR-FTIR presents a viable means of monitoring the conversion of PEGdA functional end groups within a complex mixture. UV exposure >10 s did not significantly affect the weight swelling ratio, and supports our ATR-FTIR results that network formation reached completion before 3 min of UV exposure. (C) 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据