4.8 Article

Mutation of a UDP-glucose-4-epimerase alters nematode susceptibility and ethylene responses in Arabidopsis roots

期刊

PLANT JOURNAL
卷 40, 期 5, 页码 712-724

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02257.x

关键词

ethylene sensitivity; auxin; nematode; signal transduction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In Arabidopsis, mutation of RHD1, a UDP-glucose-4-epimerase, causes root-specific phenotypes, including hypersusceptibility to the cyst nematode Heterodera schachtii, increased root hair elongation, decreased root length, and root epidermal bulging. Previous experiments suggested that increased ethylene sensitivity or production mediated the rhd1-4 phenotypes. In the present study, double mutant analyses revealed that only rhd1-4 hypersusceptibility to H. schachtii and increased root hair elongation were dependent upon the ethylene signaling genes EIN2 and EIN3 but not upon ethylene signaling mediated by the auxin efflux carrier EIR1. In contrast, the rhd1-4 short root and root epidermal bulging phenotypes did not require EIN2, EIN3, or EIR1. A time-course analysis of RHD1 transcript levels in wild-type plants treated with the ethylene precursor 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid showed a root-specific downregulation of RHD1 expression by ethylene. This observation was corroborated by our finding of increased RHD1 transcript levels in roots of the ethylene-insensitive mutants etr1 and ein2. In addition to ethylene, auxin strongly influences H. schachtii susceptibility and root hair elongation. Therefore, we investigated the sensitivity of rhd1-4 roots to indole-3-acetic acid (IAA). Equivalent IAA concentrations caused a greater reduction in rhd1-4 root elongation compared with wild-type roots. Finally, H. schachtii parasitism was found to strongly downregulate RHD1 expression in the root 3 days after inoculation. We conclude that RHD1 is a likely target of root-specific negative regulation by ethylene and that loss of RHD1 function results in a heightened sensitivity of root tissues to both ethylene and auxin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据