4.6 Article

Distinct transcriptional control and action of fibroblast growth factor receptor 4 in differentiating skeletal muscle cells

期刊

LABORATORY INVESTIGATION
卷 84, 期 12, 页码 1571-1580

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.3700187

关键词

fibroblast growth factor receptor 4; FGF; myoblasts; Sp1; Sp3

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although FGF signaling promotes myoblast proliferation and represses myogenic differentiation, one of the FGF receptors (FGFR), FGFR4, is expressed mainly in mature skeletal muscle. Disruption of FGFR4 signaling interrupts chick limb muscle formation. To determine the developmental regulation of FGFR4 expression, we compared the transcriptional control and action of FGFR4 in myoblasts and myotubes. We identified higher FGFR4 expression in differentiated myotubes than precursor myoblasts. FGFR4 promoter activity was localized within a region 115 bp upstream of the transcription start site. Overlapping fragments of this promoter displayed a distinct difference when compared by electromobility shift assay (EMSA) using nuclear extracts from myoblasts and myotubes. While fragments B (-95/-56) and C (-65/-26) formed specific complexes in both cell types, these complexes were consistently more intense in myotubes than myoblasts. These complexes were efficiently competed by an Sp-type oligonucleotide and were supershifted by Sp1 and by Sp3 antibodies. Deletions of the Sp-binding sites in fragment B (-95/-56) confirmed their critical contribution to promoter activity. Moreover, Sp1 expression correlated with FGFR4-expression in myotubes. To determine whether FGFR4 expression regulates myoblast differentiation, we infected a soluble dominant-negative FGFR4-containing adenovirus into these cells. This significantly impeded Erk1/2 phosphorylation and differentiation of myoblasts into MHC-expressing myotubes. Our findings point to distinct transcriptional regulation and action for FGFR4 in differentiating skeletal muscle cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据