4.5 Article

Neurotrophic and neuroprotective effects of the neuregulin glial growth factor-2 on dopaminergic neurons in rat primary midbrain cultures

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
卷 91, 期 6, 页码 1358-1368

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02817.x

关键词

dopamine; glial growth factor; glial growth factor-2; neuroprotection; neurotrophic factor; Parkinson's disease

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR15592] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDA NIH HHS [DA14040] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [NS39128, NS42862] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glial growth factor-2 (GGF2) and other neuregulin (NRG) isoforms have been shown to play important roles in survival, migration, and differentiation of certain neural and non-neural cells. Because midbrain dopamine (DA) cells express the NRG receptor, ErbB4, the present study examined the potential neurotrophic and/or neuroprotective effects of GGF2 on cultured primary dopaminergic neurons. Embryonic day 14 rat mesencephalic cell cultures were maintained in serum-free medium and treated with GGF2 or vehicle. The number of tyrosine hydroxylase-positive (TH+) neurons and high-affinity [H-3]DA uptake were assessed at day in vitro (DIV) 9. Separate midbrain cultures were treated with 100 ng/mL GGF2 on DIV 0 and exposed to the catecholamine-specific neurotoxin 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) on DIV 4. GGF2 treatment significantly increased DA uptake, the number of TH+ neurons, and neurite outgrowth when compared to the controls in both the serum-free and the 6-OHDA-challenged cultures. Furthermore, three NRG receptors were detected in the midbrain cultures by western blot analysis. Immunostaining for glial fibrillary acidic protein revealed that GGF2 also weakly promoted mesencephalic glial proliferation in the midbrain cultures. These results indicate that GGF2 is neurotrophic and neuroprotective for developing dopaminergic neurons and suggest a role for NRGs in repair of the damaged nigrostriatal system that occurs in Parkinson's disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据