4.5 Article

A mass spectrometric western blot to evaluate the correlations between histone methylation and histone acetylation

期刊

PROTEOMICS
卷 4, 期 12, 页码 3765-3775

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200400819

关键词

histone acetylation; histone methylation; mass spectrometry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Histone acetylation, methylation, and phosphorylation occur predominantly in the unstructured N-terminal domains or histone tails. These modifications and others comprise a histone code that directly facilitates or antagonizes association of regulatory proteins with nucleosomes to mediate changes in chromatin structure and activity. Methylation of histone H3 outside of the tail region at lysine 79 has been reported for a variety of species ranging from yeast to humans and in some gene-specific cases appears to be associated with active chromatin and transcription. Whether methylation of lysine 79 is associated with other post-translational modifications of the H3 tail is unknown. Using mass spectrometric relative quantitation, a mass spectrometric Western blot, we compare methylation at lysines 4, 9, and 79 with acetylation of human histone H3. We find that the total levels of lysine 4 and 79 methylation (combined mono-, di-, and trimethylation) in the H3 population increase with the degree of H3 tail acetylation. The total amount of lysine 4 methylation increases progressively from less than 10% in the nonacetylated H3 to greater than 90% in the penta-acetylated H3. In addition, significant levels of lysine 4 trimethylation also occur in combination with the pentaacetylated H3 species. In contrast, the level of H3 lysine 9 trimethylation is greatest for the monoacetylated species while H3 lysine 9 acetylation occurs predominantly in hyperacetylated (tetra- and penta-acetylated) H3 isoforms. Together, these results indicate that methylation of lysine 4 and 79 as well as the switch from lysine 9 methylation to acetylation are coordinated synchronously with H3 hyperacetylation as marks of active chromatin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据