4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Bioorganometallic chemistry:: biocatalytic oxidation reactions with biomimetic NAD+/NADH co-factors and [Cp*Rh(bpy)H]+ for selective organic synthesis

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORGANOMETALLIC CHEMISTRY
卷 689, 期 25, 页码 4783-4790

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2004.09.044

关键词

biocatalysis; co-factor regeneration; chemoenzymatic reactions; monoxygenase enzymes; NAD(+)/NADH biomimics; organorhodium hydride; [Cp*Rh(bpy)(H)](+); epoxide polymer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The biocatalytic, regioselective hydroxylation of 2-hydroxybiphenyl to the corresponding catechol was accomplished utilizing the monooxygenase 2-hydroxybiphenyl 3-monooxygenase (HbpA). The necessary natural 1,4-dihydronicotinamde adenine dinucleotide (NADH) co-factor for this biocatalytic process was replaced by a biornimetic co-factor, N-benzyl-1,4-dihydronicotinamide, 1b. The interaction between the flavin (FAD) containing HbpA enzyme and the corresponding biornimetic NADH compound, N-benzyl1,4-dihdronicotinamide, 1b, for hydride transfer, was shown to readily occur. The in situ recycling of the reduced NADH biomimic 1b from la was accomplished with [Cp*Rh(bpy)H](Cl); however, productive coupling of this regeneration reaction to the enzymatic hydroxylation reaction was not totally successful, due to a deactivation process concerning the HbpA enzyme peripheral groups; i.e., -SH or NH2 possibly reacting with the precatalyst, [Cp*Rh(bpy)(H2O)]Cl)(2), and thus inhibiting the co-factor regeneration process. The deactivation mechanism was studied, and a promising strategy of derivatizing these peripheral -SH or -NH2 groups with a polymer containing epoxide was successful in circumventing the undesired interaction between HbpA and the precatalyst. This latter strategy allowed tandem co-factor regeneration using la or 2a, [Cp*Rh(bpy)(H2O)]Cl)(2), and formate ion, in conjunction with the polymer bound, FAD containing HbpA enzyme to provide the catechol product. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据