4.6 Article

The impact of inter-fraction dose variations on biological equivalent dose (BED): the concept of equivalent constant dose

期刊

PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
卷 49, 期 23, 页码 5333-5345

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/49/23/010

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inter-fraction dose fluctuations, which appear as a result of setup errors. organ motion and treatment machine output variations. may influence the radiobiological effect of the treatment even when the total delivered physical dose remains constant. The effect of these inter-fraction dose fluctuations on the biological effective dose (BED) has been investigated. Analytical expressions for the BED accounting for the dose fluctuations have, been derived. The concept of biological effective constant dose (BECD) has been introduced. The equivalent constant dose (ECD), representing the constant physical dose that provides the same cell survival fraction as the fluctuating! dose, has also been introduced. The dose fluctuations with Gaussian as well as exponential probability density functions were investigated. The values of BECD and ECD calculated analytically were compared with those derived from Monte Carlo modelling. The agreement between Monte Carlo modelled and analytical values was excellent (within 1%) for a range of dose standard deviations (0-100% of the dose) and the number of fractions (2 to 37) used in the comparison. The ECDs have also been calculated for conventional radiotherapy fields. The analytical expression for the BECD shows that BECD increases linearly with the variance of the dose. The effect is relatively small, and in the flat regions of the field it results in less than 1% increase of ECD. In the penumbra region of the 6 MV single radiotherapy beam the ECD exceeded the physical dose by up to 35%. when the-standard deviation of combined patient setup/organ motion uncertainty was 5 mm. Equivalently, the ECD field was similar to2 mm wider than the physical dose field. The difference between ECD and the physical dose is greater for normal tissues than for tumours.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据