4.6 Article

N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V (Mgat5)-Mediated N-glycosylation negatively regulates Th1 cytokine production by T cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 173, 期 12, 页码 7200-7208

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.12.7200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The differentiation of naive CD4(+) T cells into either proinflammatory Th1 or proallergic Th2 cells strongly influences autoimmunity, allergy, and tumor immune surveillance. We previously demonstrated that beta1,6GIcNAc-branched complex-type (N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V (Mgat5)) N-glycans on TCR are bound to galectins, an interaction that reduces TCR signaling by opposing agonist-induced TCR clustering at the immune synapse. Mgat5(-/-) mice display late-onset spontaneous autoimmune disease and enhanced resistance to tumor progression and metastasis. In this study we examined the role of beta1,6GIcNAc N-glycan expression in Th1/Th2 cytokine production and differentiation. beta1,6GIcNAc N-glycan expression is enhanced by TCR stimulation independent of cell division and declines at the end of the stimulation cycle. Anti-CD3-activated splenocytes and naive T cells from Mgat5(-/-) mice produce more IFN-gamma and less IL-4 compared with wild-type cells, the latter resulting in the loss of IL-4-dependent down-regulation of IL-4Ralpha. Swainsonine, an inhibitor of Golgi alpha-mannosidase II, blocked beta1,6GIcNAc N-glycan expression and caused a similar increase in IFN-gamma production by T cells from humans and mice, but no additional enhancement in Mgat5(-/-) T cells. Mgat5 deficiency did not alter IFN-gamma/IL-4 production by polarized Th1 cells, but caused an similar to10-fold increase in IFN-gamma production by polarized Th2 cells. These data indicate that negative regulation of TCR signaling by beta1,6GIcNAc N-glycans; promotes development of Th2 over Th1 responses, enhances polarization of Th2 cells, and suggests a mechanism for the increased autoimmune disease susceptibility observed in Mgat5(-/-) mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据