4.7 Article

Comparative in vivo behavior studies of cyclen-based copper-64 complexes:: Regioselective synthesis, X-ray structure, radiochemistry, log P, and biodistribution

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 47, 期 26, 页码 6625-6637

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jm0496990

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [P41RR00954] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The in vivo behavior of copper(II)-cyclen complexes was modified via Substitution of the parent ligand with two different substituents, 4-tert-butylbenzyl and acetate. This was achieved by using same synthetic strategy (regioselective protection/first alkylation/deprotection/second alkylation) to give nine cyclen derivatives. The X-ray structure of [Gu(2c)Cl](-) (2c = 1-(4-tert-butylbenzyl)-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane) showed that the chlorine ion from the reaction mixture occupied the remaining apical position of a square pyramidal coordination environment of these Cu-cyclen complexes. Eight out of nine compounds were labeled with Cu-64 in high radiochemical purity. log P measurements showed that the lipophilicities of the copper complexes were increased dramatically by attaching hydrophobic substituents on the nitrogen atoms of cyclen. Conversely, as the number of acetate groups increased, the lipophilicity was decreased. The biodistribution of Cu-cyclen complexes was found to be influenced mostly by the overall charge of the complexes rather than their lipophilicity. Positively charged (divided by2) complexes showed high blood retention at early time points with sluggish clearance from liver by 24 h. The attachment of even one acetate group onto cyclen accelerated blood and liver clearance dramatically compared to +2 charged Cu(II) complexes. Neutral trans-substituted Cu-4 showed the best clearance and lowest retention of doses from all organs most time, followed by -1 charged complex Cu-2. Trans-substituted complexes structure isomers Cu-3 and Cu-4 showed better clearance and lower retention from all organs than their cis-counterparts Cu-5 and Cu-6.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据