4.7 Article

Sympathetic dysfunction in type 1 diabetes - Association with impaired myocardial blood flow reserve and diastolic dysfunction

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 44, 期 12, 页码 2368-2374

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.09.033

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK 52391] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES This study was designed to explore the relationships of early diabetic microangiopathy to alterations of cardiac sympathetic tone and myocardial blood flow (MBF) regulation in subjects with stable type 1 diabetes. BACKGROUND In diabetes, augmented cardiac sympathetic tone and abnormal MBF regulation may predispose to myocardial injury and enhanced cardiac risk. METHODS Subject groups comprised healthy controls (C) (n = 10), healthy diabetic subjects (DC) (n = 12), and diabetic subjects with very early diabetic microangiopathy (DMA+) (n = 16). [C-11]meta-hydroxyephedrine ([C-11]HED) and positron emission tomography (PET) were used to explore left ventricular (LV) sympathetic integrity and [N-13]ammonia-PET to assess MBF regulation in response to cold pressor testing (CPT) and adenosine infusion. RESULTS Deficits of LV [C-11]HED retention were extensive and global in the DMA+ subjects (36 31% vs. 1 +/- 1% in DC subjects; p < 0.01) despite preserved autonomic reflex tests. On CPT, plasma norepinephrine excursions were two-fold greater than in C and DC subjects (p < 0.05), and basal LV blood flow decreased (-12%, p < 0.05) in DMA+ but not in C or DC subjects (+45% and +51%, respectively). On adenosine infusion, compared with C subjects, MBF reserve decreased by -45% (p < 0.05) in DMA+ subjects. Diastolic dysfunction was detected by two-dimensional echocardiography in 5 of 8 and 0 of 8 consecutively tested DMA+ and DC subjects, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Augmented cardiac sympathetic tone and responsiveness and impaired myocardial perfusion may contribute to myocardial injury in diabetes. (C) 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据