4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Smooth muscle myosin: regulation and properties

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1562

关键词

smooth muscle; cross-bridge cycle; adenosine diphosphate; actomyosin; myosin phosphorylation

类别

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [G0100150] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. MRC [G0100150] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [G0100150] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NHLBI NIH HHS [P01 HL19242, P01 HL48807] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The relationship of the biochemical states to the mechanical events in contraction of smooth muscle cross-bridges is reviewed. These studies use direct measurements of the kinetics of P-i and ADP release. The rate of release of P-i from thiophosphorylated cycling cross-bridges held isometric was biphasic with turnovers of 1.8 s(-1) and 0.3 s(-1), reflecting properties and forces directly acting on cross-bridges through mechanisms such as positive strain and inhibition by high-affinity MgADP binding. Fluorescent transients reporting release of an ADP analogue 3'-deac-edaADP were significantly faster in phasic than in tonic smooth muscles. Thiophosphorylation of myosin regulatory light chains (RLCs) increased and positive strain decreased the release rate around twofold. The rates of ADP release from rigor cross-bridges and the steady-state Pi release from cycling isometric cross-bridges are similar, indicating that the ADP-release step or an isomerization preceding it may limit the ATPase rate. Thus ADP release in phasic and tonic smooth muscles is a regulated step with strain- and dephosphorylation-dependence. High affinity; of cross-bridges for ADP and slow ADP release prolong the fraction of the duty cycle occupied by strongly, bound AM(.)ADP state(s) and contribute to the high economy of force that is characteristic of smooth muscle. RLC thiophosphorylation led to scructural changes in smooth muscle cross-bridges consistent with our findings that thiophosphorylation and strain modulate product release.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据