4.8 Article

Genetic control of cell intercalation during tracheal morphogenesis in Drosophila

期刊

CURRENT BIOLOGY
卷 14, 期 24, 页码 2197-2207

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.11.056

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Branching morphogenesis transforms an epithelial sheet into a tubular network with distinct features regarding the length and diameter of individual tubes. Branching is controlled by several signaling pathways, but the molecular consequences of these pathways in the responding cells are poorly understood. Results: We have undertaken a detailed characterization of cell rearrangements during tracheal branching morphogenesis in Drosophila embryos with a GFP fusion protein labeling the adherens junctions (AJs) and high-resolution live imaging. To analyze the branching process at the cellular level, we further developed an imaging approach that allows us to follow single cells during the branching process. We find that controlled cell intercalation, which requires extensive AJ remodeling, is key to the formation of tracheal branches of different cellular complexities. In particular, most branches consist of tubes with individual cells wrapped around the lumen. These branches form through cell intercalation, which requires the transformation of most of the initial intercellular AJs into autocellular AJs. We propose a step-wise model explaining how this AJ remodeling occurs and use this model to better understand defects in various mutants. We find that Dpp and Wnt signaling control cell intercalation by regulating the expression of Spalt, a zinc finger transcription factor; Spalt inhibits intercalation, leading to the formation of large, multicellular tubes. Conclusion: Tracheal morphogenesis is regulated by an interplay of different signaling systems that control cell migration and cell intercalation, respectively. Only the combined action of these signaling systems allows efficient branch elongation and the formation of morphologically distinct branches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据