4.8 Article

A new kinetic model for titanium dioxide mediated heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of trichloroethylene in gas-phase

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 54, 期 4, 页码 261-274

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2004.06.020

关键词

photocatalysis; titanium dioxide; Degussa P25; volatile organic compounds; VOCs; trichloroethylene; gas-phase; relative humidity; kinetics; modelling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper focuses on the kinetics of photocatalytic removal and carbon mineralization of gaseous trichloroethylene (TCE) on near-UV irradiated TiO2 Degussa P25. Experiments were carried out in a flat-plate photoreactor at TCE inlet concentrations of 100-500 ppmv, relative humidities (RH) of 0-62% and gas residence times of 2.5-60.3 s. Gas residence time distribution (RTD) curves revealed an axial dispersed plug flow in the photoreactor with Peclet numbers above 59.4. For all experimental conditions, the carbon mineralization efficiency (5.173.0%) was lower than the removal efficiency (8.6-99.9%) and dichloroacety1chloride (DCAC) was detected as a gas-phase degradation product. TCE removal efficiencies increased with lower TCE inlet concentrations, lower RH and higher gas residence times. Evaluating different kinetic models by least squares analysis, it was shown that the Langmuir-Hinshel wood (LH) model could not give an adequate fitting to the experimental results. A new kinetic model, explicitly taking into account electron-hole pair reactions, was developed based on linear TCE adsorption-desorption equilibrium and first order reaction kinetics. The new kinetic model described the experimental results in a more accurate way, as exemplified by a more randomly distributed set of residuals and by a reduction of the sum of squares (SSQ) by a factor 1.7-8.5. The effect of TCE gas-phase concentration, RH and light intensity on adsorption-desorption kinetics, electron-hole concentrations and chemical conversion rates is discussed. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据