4.5 Article

Possible role for avPGC-1α in the control of expression of fiber type, along with avUCP and avANT mRNAs in the skeletal muscles of cold-exposed chickens

期刊

FEBS LETTERS
卷 579, 期 1, 页码 11-17

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.11.039

关键词

uncoupling; muscle fiber type; avPGC-1 alpha; avUCP; avANT; cold acclimation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator-lot (PGC-1alpha), a transcriptional coactivator, plays a role in mitochondrial biogenesis, muscle fiber specialization, and adaptive thermogenesis. Because of an absence of brown adipose tissue, the skeletal muscle tissue in chickens serves as an important source of thermogenesis to counter the cold. The present experiments were conducted (i) to clone the cDNA of PGC-1alpha homologs from chicken skeletal muscle and to examine alterations to PGC-1a mRNA expression in the skeletal muscles of cold-exposed chickens, (ii) to study the effect of cold-acclimation on the metabolic fiber phenotype of typically fast-glycolytic (type IIB) pectoralis muscles, and (iii) to compare avANT and avUCP mRNA expression in control and cold-exposed chickens. Results show that the cloned avPGC-1alpha cDNA encodes a 796 amino-acid protein (GenBank Accession No. AB170013) showing 84% identity with rodent PGC-1alpha cDNA. Exposure of chickens to a cold environment resulted in the prompt upregulation of avPGC-1alpha expression, which preceded increments in avUCP and avANT expression in skeletal muscle mitochondria. Consistent with the morphological appearance of muscles, an increase in the number of fast-oxidative-glycolytic (type IIA) fibers in the pectoralis muscle, which contains exclusively type IIB fibers in control chickens, was observed in cold-acclimated chickens. These findings provide novel information about possible regulatory pathways in avian skeletal muscle during thermogenesis. (C) 2004 Federation of European Biochemical Societies. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据