4.2 Article

Correlates and Experiences of HIV Stigma in Prisoners Living With HIV in Indonesia: A Mixed-Method Analysis

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1016/j.jana.2015.07.006

关键词

antiretroviral therapy; drug use; HIV; Indonesia; prisoners; stigma

类别

资金

  1. Fulbright Senior Scholar Award in Global Health from the J. William Fulbright Commission, U.S. State Department
  2. NIH Fogarty International Center, Global Health Fellows and Scholars Research Training Grant [R25 TW009338]
  3. National Institutes on Drug Abuse [R01 DA 25943, K24 DA017072]
  4. Chicago Developmental Center for AIDS Research, a National Institutes of Health (NIH) [P30 AI 082151]
  5. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
  6. National Cancer Institute
  7. National Institute of Mental Health
  8. National Institute on Drug Abuse
  9. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  10. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
  11. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In Indonesia, the syndemic nature of HIV, drug use, and incarceration may influence experiences of stigma for HIV-infected prisoners. This mixed-method study explores HIV stigma in prisoners living with HIV in Indonesia. Randomly selected male HIV-infected prisoners (n = 102) from two large prisons in Jakarta completed in-depth interviews and a structured HIV stigma survey. Quantitative results found four groups of HIV-infected prisoners with significantly higher HIV stigma levels, including those: (a) with drug-related offenses, (b) seeking help to decrease drug use, (c) diagnosed with HIV before the current incarceration, and (d) who had not disclosed their HIV status to family members or friends. Qualitative results highlighted the prominent role of HIV stigma in decisions to disclose HIV status to family members, partners, and other prisoners. Interventions should address HIV stigma in HIV-infected prisoners in Indonesia to achieve HIV treatment as prevention goals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据