4.7 Article

Microsatellite DNA markers of Ezo abalone (Haliotis discus hannai):: a preliminary assessment of natural populations sampled from heavily stocked areas

期刊

AQUACULTURE
卷 243, 期 1-4, 页码 33-47

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2004.10.013

关键词

microsatellites; abalone; Haliotis discus hannai; stocking effect; population genetics; relatedness

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reproductive success of released animals becomes a growing interest in the context of stock enhancement program and conservation biology. In the case of the Ezo abalone (Pacific abalone; Haliotis discus hannai), limited information is available about the extent of interbreeding between natural and released hatchery populations. This study aimed to develop microsatellite DNA markers from Ezo abalone to address the issue. We developed 38 microsatellite markers that worked well in three full-sib families established from wild caught abalone. Of these, nine markers, with which alleles could be scored easily and accurately, were applied to two population samples derived from coastal areas where intensive releases of hatchery-produced abalone seedlings have been carried out. Multilocus estimates of genetic population differentiation calculated based on the nine markers (F-ST analogue theta and R-ST analogue p) rejected a null hypothesis of genetic homogeneity between the populations (theta=0.048, P<0.00001; p=0.029, P=0.0051). Although both populations conformed to Hardy Weinberg's equilibrium at almost all of the nine loci, the results of simulation analysis for variance of relatedness coefficient provided evidence of nonrandom mating in each population, possibly caused by the cumulative effect of stocking on the genetic make-up. The population analysis presented here is preliminary; but we consider that the microsatellite markers are potentially an efficient means to examine the reproductive contribution of released abalone to natural resources. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据