4.7 Article

Development of a tyrosinase biosensor based on gold nanoparticles-modified glassy carbon electrodes -: Application to the measurement of a bioelectrochemical polyphenols index in wines

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 528, 期 1, 页码 1-8

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2004.10.007

关键词

gold nanocrystal-modified glassy carbon electrodes; tyrosinase biosensors; phenolic compounds; wines

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The preparation of a tyrosinase biosensor based on the immobilization of the enzyme onto a glassy carbon electrode modified with electrodeposited gold nanoparticles (Tyr-nAu-GCE) is reported. The enzyme immobilized by cross-linking with glutaraldehyde retains a high bioactivity on this electrode material. Under the optimized working variables (a An electrodeposition potential of -200 mV for 60 s. an enzyme loading of 457U, a detection potential of -0.10V and a 0.1 mol 1(-1) phosphate buffer solution of pH 7-4 as working medium) the biosensor exhibited a rapid response to the changes in the substrate concentration for all the phenolic compounds tested: phenol, catechol. caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid, gallic acid and protocatechualdehyde. AR.S.D. of 3.6% (n = 6) was obtained from the slope values of successive calibration plots for catechol with the same Tyr-nAu-GCE with no need to apply a cleaning procedure to the biosensor. The useful lifetime of one single biosensor was of at least 18 days, and a R.S.D. of 4.8% was obtained for the slope values of catechol calibradon plots obtained with five different biosensors. The kinetic constants and the analytical characteristics were calculated for all the phenolic compounds tested. The Tyr-nAu-GCE was applied for the estimation of the phenolic compounds content in red and white wines. A good correlation of the results (r = 0.990) was found when they were plotted versus those obtained by using the spectrophotometric method involving the Folin-Ciocalteau reagent. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据