4.8 Article Proceedings Paper

Nanostructured designs of biomedical materials: Applications of cell sheet engineering to functional regenerative tissues and organs

期刊

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
卷 101, 期 1-3, 页码 69-84

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.08.026

关键词

cell-adhesive surfaces; cell non-adhesive surfaces; cell detachment; hydrophilic surfaces; nanophase separated surfaces; thermoresponsive polymer; cell sheet engineering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biomaterials surface design is critical for control of cell-materials interactions. Materials surface characteristics important to cell-materials interactions are the following: (a) nonfouling surfaces where cells cannot interact; (b) surfaces that interact with cells but do not alter cell morphology or metabolism (passive adhesion processes); and (c) surfaces that strongly interact with cells and cell-surface receptors to alter cell shape after metabolic interactions (active adhesion). In this paper, we briefly discuss the relationship between materials surface characteristics and cells for biomaterials designs in these categories. We have extensively investigated the thermoresponsive polymer, poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PIPAAm), as grafted surfaces allowing recovery of confluent cell monolayers as contiguous living cell sheets for tissue engineering applications. Cellular interactions with PIPAAm-grafted surfaces can be regulated vertically using the thickness of the PIPAAm-grafted layers in nanometer-scale levels, as well as laterally (spatially) using nano-patterned PIPAAm chemistry on various other surface chemistries. PIPAAm-grafted surfaces with 15-20-nm thick layers exhibit temperature-dependent cell adhesion/detachment control, while surfaces with PIPAAm layer thicknesses of more than 30 nm do not support cell adhesion. These changes in cell adhesion are explained by the limited mobility of the surface grafted polymer chains as a function of grafting, hydration, and temperature. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据