4.7 Article

Improved paracellular uptake by the combination of different types of permeation enhancers

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
卷 288, 期 1, 页码 141-150

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2004.09.023

关键词

proteases; bromelain; thiomers; permeation enhancement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study had the purpose to improve the paracellular uptake of drugs by combining the thiomer/reduced glutathione (GSH) permeation-enhancing system with a proteolytic enzyme. Due to the covalent binding of 2-iminothiolane to chitosan the thiomer chitosan-TBA (chitosan-4-thiobutylamidine) was obtained. Permeation studies were performed with freshly excised intestinal mucosa of guinea pigs mounted in Ussing-type chambers using on the one hand the low-molecular size marker flurescein (NaFlu) and on the other hand the high-molecular size marker FITC-dextran. Apparent permeability coefficient (P-app) as well as enhancement ratios (=P-app permeation-enhancing system/P-app control) were calculated. Trypsin, papain and bromelain displayed a permeation-enhancing effect for Na-Flu on the small intestinal mucosa. Enhancement ratios of 1.84, 1.63 and 1.78 were identified for 2% trypsin, 0.5% papain and 2% bromelain solutions, respectively. However, only bromelain could guarantee a significant permeation enhancement of FITC-dextran with a Papp of 4.45 +/- 0.44 x 10(-6) cm/s representing an enhancement ratio of 1.57. A similar enhancement of FITC-dextran permeation was reached by the use of the chitosan-TBA (0.5%)/GSH (5%) system. Moreover, an additive permeation-enhancing effect of the chitosan-TBA/GSH system in combination with bromelain (2%) was observed, leading to a maximum P-app of 5.91 +/- 0.51 x 10(-6) cm/s, which corresponds to an enhancement ratio of 2.1. According to these results, the combination of the thiomer/GSH system with bromelain might represent a new promising strategy in order to raise the in vivo efficacy of non-invasive administered hydrophilic macromolecular drugs. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据