4.7 Article

Molecular basis for the effect of urea and guanidinium chloride on the dynamics of unfolded polypeptide chains

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 345, 期 1, 页码 153-162

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.10.036

关键词

protein folding; polypeptide chain dynamics; solvent denaturation; denaturant binding; Schellman model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chemical denaturants are frequently used to unfold proteins and to characterize mechanisms and transition states of protein folding reactions. The molecular basis of the effect of urea and guanidinium chloride (GdmCl) on polypeptide chains is still not well understood. Models for denaturant-protein interaction include both direct binding and indirect changes in solvent properties. Here we report studies on the effect of urea and GdmCl on the rate constants (k(c)) of end-to-end diffusion in unstructured poly(glycine-serine) chains of different length. Urea and GdmCl both lead to a linear decrease of ln k(c) with denaturant concentration, as observed for the rate constants for protein folding. This suggests that the effect of denaturants on chain dynamics significantly contributes to the denaturant-dependence of folding rate constants for small proteins. We show that this linear dependency is the result of two additive nonlinear effects, namely increased solvent viscosity and denaturant binding. The contribution from denaturant binding can be quantitatively described by Schellman's weak binding model with binding constants (K) of 0.62(+/-0.01) M-1 for GdmCl and 0.26(+/-0.01) M-1 for urea. In our model peptides the number of binding sites and the effect of a bound denaturant molecule on chain dynamics is identical for urea and GdmCl. The results further identify the polypeptide backbone as the major denaturant binding site and give an upper limit of a few nanoseconds for residence times of denaturant molecules on the polypeptide chain. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据