4.6 Article

Myocardial ischemia differentially regulates LKB1 and an alternate 5′-AMP-activated protein kinase kinase

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 280, 期 1, 页码 183-190

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M411810200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During myocardial ischemia, activation of 5'-AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) leads to the stimulation of glycolysis and fatty acid oxidation. Together these metabolic changes contribute to cardiac dysfunction. Although AMPK signaling in the ischemic heart is well characterized, the relative contribution of phosphorylation by AMPK kinase (AMPKK), and positive allosterism by the ratios of AMP: ATP and creatine (Cr):phosphocreatine (PCr), in stimulating AMPK during ischemia are unknown. In hearts subjected to severe ischemia, the ratios of AMP: ATP and Cr: PCr were significantly elevated as compared with aerobic hearts. Severe ischemia stimulated AMPK signaling, as demonstrated by an increase in both AMPK activity and acetylCoA carboxylase phosphorylation. Although AMPK phosphorylation was increased by severe ischemia, the protein abundance and activity of the recently identified AMPKK, LKB1, were similar between aerobic and severely ischemic hearts. However, in contrast to LKB1, the activity of AMPKK was stimulated in severely ischemic hearts. To further delineate the relative roles of positive allosterism and AMPKK in the regulation of AMPK during ischemia, hearts were subjected to mild ischemia. Although mild ischemia did not alter the ratios of AMP: ATP and Cr: PCr, mild ischemia increased AMPK activity and increased AMPK phosphorylation. Mild ischemia also stimulated the activity of AMPKK. In summary, we demonstrate that myocardial ischemia stimulates AMPK via an AMPKK other than LKB1. Additionally, we show that changes in high energy phosphates are not essential for the activation of AMPK by ischemia. Our data emphasize the critical role AMPKK plays in mediating AMPK signaling during myocardial ischemia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据