4.7 Review

Virosomes for antigen and DNA delivery

期刊

ADVANCED DRUG DELIVERY REVIEWS
卷 57, 期 3, 页码 451-463

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2004.09.005

关键词

virosomes; antigen; DNA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Specific targeting and delivery as well as the display of antigens on the surface of professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs) are key issues in the design and development of new-generation vaccines aimed at the induction of both humoral and cell-mediated immunity. Prophylactic vaccination against infectious diseases in general aims at the induction of humoral immune responses to prevent infection. This humoral immune response is mediated by antibody-producing B cells. On the other hand, therapeutic immunisation against virally infected cells and tumour cells requires the induction of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) that can specifically recognise and lyse infected cells or transformed tumour cells. The induction of Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) class I restricted CTL activity is optimally achieved by synthesis of antigens within APCs, for example, after immunisation with live attenuated virus. However, immunisation with live vaccines bears the risk of causing disease. Therefore, alternative vaccine delivery systems, which enable introduction of nonreplicating antigen into the MHC class I presentation pathway, are sought. Furthermore, for the induction of effective humoral and cellular responses, MHC class II restricted activation of T helper cells (Th cells) is required. Among other delivery systems, as described in this theme issue of Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, virosomes seem ideally suited for delivery of antigens into both MHC pathways. In this review, we will focus on the use of virosomes as carrier vehicles for the intracellular delivery of protein antigens and DNA, and the induction of a cellular immune response against encapsulated protein antigens and proteins expressed by virosome-associated plasmids. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据