4.7 Article

Stellar-mass black hole binaries as ultraluminous X-ray sources

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08489.x

关键词

accretion, accretion discs; black hole physics; binaries : general; stars : neutron; X-rays : binaries

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ultraluminous X-ray sources (ULXs) with L-x > 10(39) erg s(-1) have been discovered in great numbers in external galaxies with ROSAT, Chandra and XMM-Newton. The central question regarding this important class of sources is whether they represent an extension in the luminosity function of binary X-ray sources containing neutron stars and stellar-mass black holes (BHs), or a new class of objects, e. g. systems containing intermediate-mass BHs (100-1000 M-.). We have carried out a theoretical study to test whether a large fraction of the ULXs, especially those in galaxies with recent star formation activity, can be explained with binary systems containing stellar-mass BHs. To this end, we have applied a unique set of binary evolution models for BH X-ray binaries, coupled to a binary population synthesis code, to model the ULXs observed in external galaxies. We find that for donor stars with initial masses greater than or similar to10 M-. the mass transfer driven by the normal nuclear evolution of the donor star is sufficient to potentially power most ULXs. This is the case during core hydrogen burning and, to an even more pronounced degree, while the donor star ascends the giant branch, although the latter phases last only 5 per cent of the main-sequence phase. We show that with only a modest violation of the Eddington limit, e. g. a factor of 10, both the numbers and properties of the majority of the ULXs can be reproduced. One of our conclusions is that if stellar-mass BH binaries account for a significant fraction of ULXs in star-forming galaxies, then the rate of formation of such systems is similar to3 x 10(-7) yr(-1) normalized to a core-collapse supernova rate of 0.01 yr(-1).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据