4.5 Article

Identification and functional consequences of a novel MRE11 mutation affecting 10 Saudi Arabian patients with the ataxia telangiectasia-like disorder

期刊

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 307-318

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddi027

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ten new patients with ataxia telangiectasia-like disorder (ATLD) from three unrelated Saudi Arabian families have been identified aged 5-37 representing the largest cohort of ATLD patients ever identified. They presented with an early-onset, slowly progressive, ataxia plus ocular apraxia phenotype with an absence of tumor development, even in the oldest patient. Extra-neurological features such as telangiectasia, raised alpha-fetoprotein and reduced immunoglobulin levels were absent. No translocations were found in the two investigated patients, and the presence of microcephaly was noted in four out of eight ascertained patients. All patients are homozygous for a novel missense mutation (630G-->C, W210C) of the MRE11 gene. The cellular consequences of this amino acid change, localized in the nuclease domain of the Mre11 protein, have been determined in fibroblast cultures established from two individuals. They showed high constitutive levels of Mre11 and Rad50 proteins compared with cells from normal individuals but a very low level of the Nbs1 protein. After exposure to ionizing radiation, a dose-dependent defect in ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM)-serine 1981, p53-serine 15 and Chk2 phosphorylation, and p53 stabilization were noted, together with a failure to form Mre11 foci and enhanced radiation sensitivity. Formation of gammaH2AX foci was similar to that seen in normal fibroblasts under the experimental conditions examined. These results emphasize the importance of functional interactions among the three proteins of the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex and lend support to a role of this complex as a sensor of DNA double-strand breaks, acting upstream of ATM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据