Differential proteomics via probabilistic peptide identification scores

Relative quantitation is key to enable differential proteomics and hence answer biological questions by comparing samples. Classical approaches involve stable isotope labeling with/without spiked standards. Although stable isotopes may lead to precise results, their application is not straightforward. In Proteomics, 2004, 4, 23332351, we proposed an approach where we summed peptide identification scores to derive a semiquantitative abundance indicator. In this study, we combine such an indicator with a statistical test to detect differentially expressed proteins. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this method by using mixtures of purified proteins and human plasma spiked with proteins at low-nanomolar concentrations. The impact of the number of repeated experiments is discussed, and we show that the statistical test we use performs well with two to three repetitions, whereas a classical t-test would require at least four repetitions to achieve the same performance. Typically, 2.5-5-fold changes are detected with 90-95% confidence in human plasma. The method is finally characterized by deriving estimates of its false positive and negative rates. This new characterization is valid for a wider class of methods such as spectrum sampling (Liu, H.; Sadygov, R. G.; Yates, J. R. Ill. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76, 41934201).