4.3 Article

Diffuse CO2 efflux from Iwojima volcano, Izu-Ogasawara arc, Japan

期刊

JOURNAL OF VOLCANOLOGY AND GEOTHERMAL RESEARCH
卷 139, 期 3-4, 页码 147-161

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2004.08.003

关键词

Iwojima volcano; diffuse CO2 efflux; soil gas; fumarolic gas; carbon isotope ratio; phreatic explosion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

lwojima volcano, located on the southernmost part of the Izu-Ogasawara arc, is characterized by the extrusion of trachyte or trachy andesite lavas and pyroclastic rocks of Holocene and surface thermal manifestations. Small phreatic explosions have been recorded frequently during the last 100 years with the most recent in 1999 and 2001. In order to elucidate the behavior of volcanic volatiles and to assess the potential activity of this volcano, diffuse CO2 efflux, CO2 content and delta(13) C-CO2 in soil gas, and soil temperature at 30 cm depth were measured at 272 sites in March 2000, 112 sites in December 2000 and 40 sites in December 2001. We found that high CO2 efflux values, of more than 100 g M-2 day(-1), occurred at several locations on Motoyama volcano corresponding with high soil temperatures (more than 60 degreesC at 30 cm depth) region and with areas where CO2 with magmatic delta(13)C was observed. Here, the magmatic delta(13)C determined for fumarolic CO2 data ranged from -2%o to +3%o, which is clearly higher than magmatic gas values (-8%o to -2%o) typically found in island are settings around the world. However, this can be explained in terms of carbon-isotope fractionation between calcite and CO2 under subsurface temperature and pressure conditions at lwojima. A total efflux Of CO2 for lwojima. volcano is estimated to be 760 t day(-1), with a magmatic contribution of about 450 t day. This value is rather high compared with other volcanoes in island arc settings. Since Iwojima has no visible plume, almost all volcanic CO2 is released as diffuse efflux through the volcanic edifice. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据