4.6 Article

Resolution of a 16.8-mb autoimmunity-regulating rat chromosome 4 region into multiple encephalomyrelitis quantitative trait loci and evidence for epistasis

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 174, 期 2, 页码 918-924

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.2.918

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To investigate effects of a 16.8-Mb region on rat chromosome 4q42-43 on encephalomyelitis, we performed a high-resolution mapping using a 10th generation advanced intercross line between the susceptible DA strain and the MHC identical but resistant PVG.1AV1 strain. Clinical signs of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-induced experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) developed in 29% of 772 F-10 rats. Three regions controlling disease, Eae20, Eae21, and Eae22, were mapped using 15 microsatellite markers spanning 16.8 Mb. Eae20 was a major genetic determinant within the region whereas Eae21 modified disease severity. Eae22 was identified as an epistatic region because, it only displayed an effect together with Piebald Virol Glaxo (PVG) alleles on Eae20. Disease down-regulation by PVG alleles in the telomeric part of Eae20 was also demonstrated in DA rats made congenic for a similar to1.44-Mb chromosomal region from PVG. As the region containing Eae20-Eae22 also regulates arthritis, together with the fact that the syntenic mouse 6F(2)-F-3 region regulates experimental lupus and diabetes, and the syntenic human 12p13.31-13.2 region regulates multiple sclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis, the present data point to genes that control several inflammatory diseases. The pairscan analyses of interaction, which here identified Eae22, are novel in the encephalomyelitis field and of importance in the design of further studies of this region in other diseases and species. The limited number of genes identified in Eae20, Eae21, and Eae22 enables focused examination of their relevance in mechanistic animal studies and screening of their association to human diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据