4.6 Article

Synthetic cannabinoid WIN55,212-2 inhibits generation of inflammatory mediators by IL-1β-stimulated human astrocytes

期刊

GLIA
卷 49, 期 2, 页码 211-219

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/glia.20108

关键词

astrocytes; cannabinoids; cytokines; nitric oxide; WIN55,212-2

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Activated glial cells have been implicated in the neuropathogenesis of many infectious and inflammatory diseases of the brain. A number of inflammatory-mediators have been proposed to play a role in glial cell-related brain damage: e.g. free radicals such as nitric oxide (NO), cytokines, and chemokines. Our laboratory has been interested in the effect of psychoactive drugs and their derivatives on the production of these mediators. Cannabinoids have been shown to possess immunomodulatory as well as psychoactive properties. We previously have shown that interleukin (W-1beta-Stimulated human astrocytes, but not microglia, produce NO. In this study. we investigated the effects of the synthetic cannabinoid WIN55,212-2 on the production of Several key inflammatory mediators by human fetal astrocytes activated by IL-1beta. Expression of the cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2 was detected on human astrocyteS. WIN55.212-2 (10(-5) M) potently inhibited inducible NO synthase (iNOS) and corresponding ,NO production by IL-1beta-stimulated astrocytes. The CB1 and CB2 receptor-specific antagonists SR141716A and SR144528, respectively, partially blocked this suppressive effect. In addition, treatment of astrocytes with WIN55,212-2 downregulated in a concentration-dependent manner IL-1beta-induced tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha release. Treatment with WIN55,212-2 also inhibited production of the chemokines CXCL10, CCL2 and CCL5 by IL-1beta-activated astrocytes. These findings indicate that WIN55.212-2 inhibits the production of inflammatory mediators by IL-1beta-stimulated human astrocyteS and suggest that comparable agents may have therapeutic potential for the management of brain inflammation. (C) 2004 Wiley-Liss. Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据