4.3 Review

Protein maintenance in aging and replicative senescence: a role for the peptide methionine sulfoxide reductases

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2004.08.018

关键词

protein oxidation; aging; replicative senescence; protein maintenance; proteasome; peptide methionine sulfoxide reductase

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cellular aging is characterized by the build-up of oxidatively modified protein that results, at least in part, from impaired redox homeostasis associated with the aging process. Protein degradation and repair are critical for eliminating oxidized proteins from the cell. Oxidized protein degradation is mainly achieved by the proteasomal system and it is now well established that proteasomal function is generally impaired with age. Specific enzymatic systems have been identified which catalyze the regeneration of cysteine and methionine following oxidation within proteins. Protein-bound methionine sulfoxide diastereoisomers S and R are repaired by the combined action of the enzymes MsrA and MsrB that are subsequently regenerated by thioredoxin/thioredoxin reductase. Importantly, the peptide methionine sulfoxide reductase system has been implicated in increased longevity and resistance to oxidative stress in different cell types and model organisms. In a previous study, we reported that peptide methionine sulfoxide reductase activity as well as gene and protein expression of MsrA are decreased in various organs as a function of age. More recently, we have shown that gene expression of both MsrA and MsrB2 (Cbs-1) is decreased during replicative senescence of WI-38 fibroblasts, and this decline is associated with an alteration in catalytic activity and the accumulation of oxidized protein. In this review, we will address the importance of protein maintenance in the aging process as well as in replicative senescence, with a special focus on regulation of the peptide methionine sulfoxide reductase systems. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据