4.8 Article

Postconditioning inhibits mitochondrial permeability transition

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 111, 期 2, 页码 194-197

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000151290.04952.3B

关键词

ischemia; reperfusion; myocardial infarction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background - Brief periods of ischemia performed just at the time of reperfusion can reduce infarct size, a phenomenon called postconditioning. After reflow, opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) has been involved in lethal reperfusion injury. We hypothesized that postconditioning may modulate mPTP opening. Methods and Results - Anesthetized open-chest rabbits underwent 30 minutes of ischemia and 4 hours of reperfusion. Control hearts underwent no additional intervention. Postconditioning consisted of 4 episodes of 1 minute of coronary occlusion and 1 minute of reperfusion performed after 1 minute of reflow after the prolonged ischemia. Preconditioning consisted of 5 minutes of ischemia and 5 minutes of reperfusion before the 30-minute ischemia. An additional group of rabbits received 5 mg/kg IV of NIM811, a specific inhibitor of the mPTP, 1 minute before reperfusion. Infarct size was assessed by triphenyltetrazolium staining. Mitochondria were isolated from the risk region myocardium, and Ca2+-induced mPTP opening was assessed by use of a potentiometric method. Postconditioning, preconditioning, and NIM811 significantly limited infarct size, which averaged 29 +/- 4%, 18 +/- 4%, and 20 +/- 4% of the risk region, respectively, versus 61 +/- 6% in controls ( P less than or equal to 0.001 versus control). The Ca2+ load required to open the mPTP averaged 41 +/- 4, 47 +/- 5, and 67 +/- 9 mumol/L CaCl2 per mg of mitochondrial proteins in postconditioning, preconditioning, and NIM811, respectively, significantly higher than the value of 16 +/- 4 mumol/L per mg in controls ( P less than or equal to 0.05). Conclusions - Postconditioning inhibits opening of the mPTP and provides a powerful antiischemic protection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据