4.7 Article

Controlling bursting in cortical cultures with closed-loop multi-electrode stimulation

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 680-688

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4209-04.2005

关键词

bursting; dissociated culture; cortex; epilepsy; distributed stimulation; multi-electrode array; deep brain stimulation

资金

  1. NIBIB NIH HHS [R01 EB000786, EB00786] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS038628-04, NS44134, R01 NS038628, R01 NS044134, NS38628] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One of the major modes of activity of high-density cultures of dissociated neurons is globally synchronized bursting. Unlike in vivo, neuronal ensembles in culture maintain activity patterns dominated by global bursts for the lifetime of the culture ( up to 2 years). We hypothesize that persistence of bursting is caused by a lack of input from other brain areas. To study this hypothesis, we grew small but dense monolayer cultures of cortical neurons and glia from rat embryos on multi-electrode arrays and used electrical stimulation to substitute for afferents. We quantified the burstiness of the firing of the cultures in spontaneous activity and during several stimulation protocols. Although slow stimulation through individual electrodes increased burstiness as a result of burst entrainment, rapid stimulation reduced burstiness. Distributing stimuli across several electrodes, as well as continuously fine-tuning stimulus strength with closed-loop feedback, greatly enhanced burst control. We conclude that externally applied electrical stimulation can substitute for natural inputs to cortical neuronal ensembles in transforming burst-dominated activity to dispersed spiking, more reminiscent of the awake cortex in vivo. This nonpharmacological method of controlling bursts will be a critical tool for exploring the information processing capacities of neuronal ensembles in vitro and has potential applications for the treatment of epilepsy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据