4.7 Article

Molecular gas structure around an active galactic nucleus with nuclear starburst: Three-dimensional non-LTE calculations of CO lines

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 619, 期 1, 页码 93-104

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/426377

关键词

galaxies : nuclei; galaxies : starburst; ISM : kinematics and dynamics; ISM : structure methods : numerical

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have performed three-dimensional, non-LTE (non-local thermodynamic equilibrium) radiative transfer calculations for (CO)-C-12 and (CO)-C-13 lines, applying them to our high-resolution hydrodynamic models of the torus around a supermassive black hole in an active galactic nucleus. The hydrodynamic simulations reveal inhomogeneous and turbulent gas structure on a subparsec scale in a circumnuclear starburst region. Thick disks interlaced with filaments, clumps, and holes are naturally formed as a result of the interplay among energy feedback from supernovae, self-gravity of the gas, galactic rotation, and radiative cooling. The intensity maps of the molecular lines for the circumnuclear disks show a clumpy structure, reflecting the intrinsic inhomogeneity and turbulent motion of the gas disk. The fine structure of the torus could be resolved in nearby active galaxies using the Atacama Large Millimeter Array. We also found that the CO-to-H-2 conversion factor (X-factor) is not uniformly distributed in the central 100 pc region. The X-factor derived for (CO)-C-12 (J = 1-0) intensity depends strongly on the intensity, whereas the X for (CO)-C-12 (J = 3-2) is nearly constant over 2 orders of magnitude of the intensity. The suggested conversion factor for the molecular gas mass is XCO(J = 3-2) similar to 0.27 x 10(20) cm(-2) (K kms(-1))(-1). The line ratio of high-J transitions of CO is not uniformly distributed in the nuclear disk, and the apparent ratio depends on the beam sizes. Observed (CO)-C-12(J = 4-3)= (CO)-C-12(J = 2-1) can differ from the intrinsic ratio by as much as 20%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据