4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Empirical relationships between coloured dissolved organic matter (CDOM) absorption and apparent optical properties in Baltic Sea waters

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING
卷 26, 期 2, 页码 345-370

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01431160410001720270

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coloured dissolved organic matter (CDOM), also know as yellow substances, dissolved in Baltic Sea waters is a dominant constituent, absorbing light in the blue and green parts of the spectrum. The relative share of CDOM absorption in the total absorption of blue light can reach 80%. This causes a high correlation between the CDOM absorption coefficient a(y)(400) and irradiance diffuse attenuation coefficient K-d(412). The seasonal variations of CDOM and particulate absorption have a combined effect on the magnitude and shape of the irradiance diffuse attenuation coefficient spectra, which is represented by a shift of the maximum transmission wavelength towards the red part of the spectrum. Such an effect has been observed in the Gulf of Gdansk during recent experiments. CDOM absorption also influences the shape of remote sensing reflectance spectra. Appropriate spectral bands for the construction of a local, empirical, remote sensing algorithm for quantification of CDOM absorption are proposed, based on the seasonal variability of remote sensing reflectance spectra. The empirical relationships between CDOM absorption and downwelling irradiance diffuse attenuation coefficient and spectral reflectance are presented and their potential for quantifying CDOM absorption is explored. The CDOM absorption coefficient is highly correlated with downwelling irradiance diffuse attenuation coefficient in the blue. The estimation of CDOM absorption using the downwelling irradiance measurements can be achieved with low errors: -4.6% systematic and 25.3% random. The estimation of CDOM absorption from empirical relationships between absorption and remote sensing reflectance suffers lower accuracy: 4% for systematic and 32% for random errors of estimates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据