4.7 Article

Satellite number density profiles of primary galaxies in the 2dFGRS

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08518.x

关键词

galaxies : evolution; galaxies : formation; galaxies : haloes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We analyse the projected radial distribution of satellites around bright primary galaxies in the 2dFGRS. We have considered several primary-satellite subsamples to search for dependencies of the satellite number density profiles, rho(r(p)), on properties of satellites and primaries. We find significant differences in the behaviour of rho(r(p)) depending on primary characteristics. In star-forming primaries, the satellite number density profile is consistent with power laws within projected distance 20 < r(p) < 500 kpc. On the other hand, passively star-forming primaries show flat rho(r(p)) for 20 < r(p) <= 70 kpc, well fitted by generalized King models with a large core radius parameter (r(c) similar to 68 kpc). In the external regions of the haloes (r(p) > 100 kpc), the density profiles of all primaries are well described by power laws rho(r(p)) proportional to r(alpha), although we notice that for red, early spectral type primaries, the outer slope obtained is steeper (alpha(red) similar to 1.12) than that corresponding to blue, late spectral type primaries (alpha(blue) similar to-0.79). We have tested our results by control samples of galaxies identical to the samples of satellites in apparent magnitude and projected distance to the primary, but with a large relative velocity. This sample of unphysical primary-galaxy pairs shows a flat radial density profile beyond r(p) = 20 kpc indicating that our results are not biased toward a decrease of the true number of objects due to catalogue selection effects. Our results can be understood in terms of dynamical friction and tidal stripping on satellites in the primary haloes. These processes can effectively transfer energy to the dark matter, flattening the central steep profiles of the satellite distribution in evolved systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据