4.4 Article

Equilibrium and kinetic analysis of nucleotide binding to the DEAD-box RNA helicase DbpA

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 44, 期 3, 页码 959-970

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi048253i

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM6460-02] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Escherichia coli DEAD-box protein A (DbpA) is an RNA helicase that utilizes the energy from ATP binding and hydrolysis to facilitate structural rearrangements of rRNA. We have used the fluorescent nucleotide analogues, mantADP and mantATP, to measure the equilibrium binding affinity and kinetic mechanism of nucleotide binding to DbpA in the absence of RNA. Binding generates an enhancement in mant-nucleotide fluorescence and a corresponding reduction in intrinsic DbpA fluorescence, consistent with fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) from DbpA tryptophan(s) to bound nucleotides. Fluorescent modification does not significantly interfere with the affinities and kinetics of nucleotide binding. Different energy transfer efficiencies between DbpA-mantATP and DbpA-mantADP complexes suggest that DbpA adopts nucleotide-dependent conformations. ADP binds (K-d similar to 50 muM at 22 degreesC) 4-7 times more tightly than ATP (K-d similar to 400 muM at 22 degreesC). Both nucleotides bind with relatively temperature-independent association rate constants (similar to1-3 muM(-1) s(-1)) that are much lower than predicted for a diffusion-limited reaction. Differences in the binding affinities are dictated primarily by the dissociation rate constants. ADP binding occurs with a positive change in the heat capacity, presumably reflecting a nucleotide-induced conformational rearrangement of DbpA. At low temperatures (<22 degreesC) , the binding free energies are dominated by favorable enthalpic and unfavorable entropic contributions. At physiological temperatures (>22 degreesC), ADP binding occurs with positive entropy changes. We favor a mechanism in which ADP binding increases the conformational flexibility and dynamics of DbpA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据