4.8 Article

Heart failure and death after myocardial infarction in the community - The emerging role of mitral regurgitation

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 111, 期 3, 页码 295-301

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000151097.30779.04

关键词

mitral valve; regurgitation; myocardial infarction; prognosis; population

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL 72435, R01 HL 59205] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR30582] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background - In case series, mitral regurgitation (MR) increased the risk of death after myocardial infarction (MI), yet the prevalence of MR, its incremental prognostic value over ejection fraction (EF), and its association with heart failure and death after MI in the community is not known. Methods and Results - The prevalence of MR and its association with heart failure and death were examined among 1331 patients within a geographically defined MI incidence cohort between 1988 and 1998. Echocardiography was performed within 30 days after MI in 773 patients (58%), and MR was present in 50% of cases, mild in 38%, and moderate or severe in 12%. Among patients with MR, a murmur was inconsistently detected clinically. After 4.7 +/- 3.3 years of follow-up, 109 episodes of heart failure and 335 deaths occurred. There was a graded positive association between the presence and severity of MR and heart failure or death. Moderate or severe MR was associated with a large increase in the risk of heart failure ( relative risk 3.44, 95% CI 1.74 to 6.82, P < 0.001) and death ( relative risk 1.55, 95% CI 1.08 to 2.22, P = 0.019) among 30-day survivors independent of age, gender, EF, and Killip class. Conclusions - In the community, MR is frequent and often silent after MI. It carries information to predict heart failure or death among 30-day survivors independently of age, gender, EF, and Killip class. These findings, which are applicable to a large community-based MI cohort, suggest that the assessment of MR should be included in post-MI risk stratification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据