4.5 Article

Degradation of the electrical conductivity in stabilised zirconia system Part II:: Scandia-stabilised zirconia

期刊

SOLID STATE IONICS
卷 176, 期 3-4, 页码 261-268

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssi.2004.07.039

关键词

solid oxide fuel cells; zirconia-scandia electrolytes; degradation of the ionic conductivity; cubic stabilisation; 10ScSZ doped with alumina and titania

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Scandia-stabilised zirconia (ScSZ) electrolyte materials exhibit the highest conductivity of all the zirconia systems, but the degradation in the ScSZ system has only been investigated yet for samples of 7.8, 8.0 and 11.0 mol% Sc2O3. Therefore, ScSZ electrolytes with scandia contents varying from 7 to 13 mol% were synthesised and their electrical conductivity and phase composition was determined as a function of annealing time at 1000 degreesC. A conductivity degradation occurs in aged specimens with less than 10 mol% Sc2O3, which were cubic at room temperature. On the other hand, the conductivity of the specimens with higher scandia content was stable after annealing. These specimens were rhombohedral at room temperature, but transform into the cubic phase between 400 and 600 degreesC. This phase transition is accompanied by a volume change DeltaV of 0.15%. To suppress the phase change, 1 mol% Al2O3 was added to specimens with 7-13 mol% scandia. They showed no relevant difference in conductivity and phase to the specimens without alumina. In addition, 10ScSZ samples were doped with higher amounts of alumina up to 5.5 mol% (Al-10ScSZ), and titania up to 6 mol% (Ti-10ScSZ). The cubic phase stabilisation was not obtained with the addition of 5.5 mol% Al2O3, but already with the addition of 2 mol% TiO2. On the other hand, the conductivity drop of both the Al- and the Ti-10ScSZ electrolytes with increasing alumina or titania content, makes them uninteresting for applications in solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC). Finally an interpretation for the conductivity degradation for stabilised zirconia electrolytes is given. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据