4.6 Article

Palomar/Las Campanas Imaging Atlas of blue compact dwarf galaxies. II. Surface photometry and the properties of the underlying stellar population

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES
卷 156, 期 2, 页码 345-360

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/427068

关键词

atlases; galaxies : dwarf; galaxies : evolution; galaxies : fundamental parameters; galaxies : photometry; galaxies : starburst

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present the results from an analysis of surface photometry of B, R, and Halpha images of a total of 114 nearby galaxies (v(helio) < 4000 km s(-1)) drawn from the Palomar/Las Campanas Imaging Atlas of blue compact dwarf (BCD) galaxies. Surface brightness and color profiles for the complete sample have been obtained. We determine the exponential and Sersic profiles that best fit the surface brightness distribution of the underlying stellar population detected in these galaxies. We also compute the (B-R) color and total absolute magnitude of the underlying stellar population and compared them to the integrated properties of the galaxies in the sample. Our analysis shows that the (B-R) color of the underlying population is systematically redder than the integrated color, except in those galaxies where the integrated colors are strongly contaminated by line and nebular-continuum emission. We also find that galaxies with relatively red underlying stellar populations [ typically (B-R) >= 1 mag] show structural properties compatible with those of dwarf elliptical galaxies (i.e., a smooth light distribution, fainter extrapolated central surface brightness, and larger scale lengths than BCD galaxies with blue underlying stellar populations). At least similar to 15% of the galaxies in the sample are compatible with being dwarf elliptical (dE) galaxies experiencing a burst of star formation. For the remaining BCD galaxies in the sample we do not find any correlation between the recent star formation activity and their structural differences with respect to other types of dwarf galaxies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据