4.7 Article

Combined therapy with methylprednisolone and erythropoietin in a model of multiple sclerosis

期刊

BRAIN
卷 128, 期 -, 页码 375-385

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awh365

关键词

methylprednisolone; erythropoietin; experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis; neuroprotection; visual evoked potentials

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neurodegenerative processes determine the clinical disease course of multiple sclerosis, an inflammatory autoimmune CNS disease that frequently manifests with acute optic neuritis. None of the established multiple sclerosis therapies has been shown to clearly reduce neurodegeneration. In a rat model of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, we recently demonstrated increased neuronal apoptosis under methylprednisolone therapy, although CNS inflammation was effectively controlled. In the present study, we combined steroid treatment with application of erythropoietin to target inflammatory as well as neurodegenerative aspects. After immunization with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG), animals were randomly assigned to six treatment groups receiving different combinations of erythropoietin and methylprednisolone, or respective monotherapies. After MOG-induced experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis became clinically manifest, optic neuritis was monitored by recording visual evoked potentials. The function of retinal ganglion cells, the neurons that form the axons of the optic nerve, was measured by electroretinograms. Functional and histo pathological data of retinal ganglion cells and optic nerves revealed that neuron and axon protection was most effective when erythropoietin treatment that was started at immunization was combined with high-dose methylprednisolone therapy given from days 1 to 3 of MOG-induced experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. In contrast, isolated neuronal or axonal protection without clinical benefit was achieved under monotherapy with erythropoietin or methylprednisolone, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据