4.7 Article

CYP3A4 is a vitamin D-24- and 25-hydroxylase: Analysis of structure function by site-directed mutagenesis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
卷 90, 期 2, 页码 1210-1219

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2004-0966

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK56603-01A1] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM 54995, R37 GM054995] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies were performed to identify the microsomal enzyme that 24-hydroxylates vitamin D, whether 25-hydroxylation occurs, and structure function of the enzyme. Sixteen hepatic recombinant microsomal cytochrome P450 enzymes expressed in baculovirus-infected insect cells were screened for 24-hydroxylase activity. CYP3A4, a vitamin D-25-hydroxylase, and CYP1A1 had the highest 24-hydroxylase activity with 1alpha-hydroxyvitamin D-2 (1alphaOHD(2)) as substrate. The ratio of rates of 24-hydroxylation of 1alpha-hydroxyvitamin D-3 (1alphaOHD(3)), 1alphaOHD(2), and vitamin D-2 by CYP3A4 was 3.6/2.8/1.0. Structures of 24-hydroxyvitamin D-2, 1,24(S)-dihydroxyvitamin D-2, and 1,24-dihydroxyvitamin D-3 were confirmed by HPLC and gas chromatography retention time and mass spectroscopy. In characterized human liver microsomes, 24-hydroxylation of 1alphaOHD(2) by CYP3A4 correlated significantly with 6beta-hydroxylation of testosterone, a marker of CYP3A4 activity. 24-Hydroxylase activity in recombinant CYP3A4 and pooled human liver microsomes showed dose-dependent inhibition by ketoconazole, troleandomycin, alpha-naphthoflavone, and isoniazid, known inhibitors of CYP3A4. Rates of 24- and 25-hydroxylation of 1alphaOHD(2) and 1alphaOHD(3) were determined in recombinant wild-type CYP3A4 and site-directed mutants and naturally occurring variants expressed in Escherichia coli. Substitution of residues showed the most prominent alterations of function at residues 119, 120,301, 305, and 479. Thus, CYP3A4 is both a 24- and 25-hydroxylase for vitamin D-2, 1alphaOHD(2), and 1alphaOHD(3).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据