3.8 Article

Estrogenic and anti-androgenic activities of benzophenones in human estrogen and androgen receptor mediated mammalian reporter gene assays

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEALTH SCIENCE
卷 51, 期 1, 页码 48-54

出版社

PHARMACEUTICAL SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.1248/jhs.51.48

关键词

hydroxylated benzophenone; estrogenic activity; anti-androgenic activity; mammalian reporter gene assay; 2,4,4 '-trihydroxybenzophenone; 2,2 ',4,4 '-tetrahydroxybenzophenone

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The estrogenic and anti-androgenic activities of benzophenone and 19 hydroxylated derivatives were measured in reporter gene assays using transfected human estrogen and androgen receptors in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Eighteen benzophenones had estrogenic activity and seventeen also had anti-androgenic activity. In both assays, 2,4,4'-trihydroxybenzophenone and 2,2',4,4'-tetrahydroxybenzophenone showed the strongest activity which were comparable to bisphenol A or 1,1-dichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl) ethylene (DDE). The structure- activity relationships of the estrogenic activity in this mammalian reporter gene assay were mostly similar to the yeast two-hybrid assay as previously reported. Benzophenones hydroxylated at the 3 or 4-position showed the estrogenic activity, while the others showed negative or weakly positive activities. Moreover, a hydroxyl group added at the 2-position of the 4-hydroxylated benzophenone enhanced activity, but reduced activity at the 3-position. In contrast, different results were obtained when a hydroxyl group was added to another benzene ring. The added hydroxyl group enhanced the activity in this reporter gene assay, but reduced it in the yeast two-hybrid assay. Results from the reporter gene assay corresponded with the in vivo, uterotrophic assay. On the other hand, a hydroxyl group at the 2-position generally enhanced the anti-androgenic activity, though the effect of other hydroxyl groups was less clear. Meanwhile, these benzophenones had no or very weak androgen agonistic activities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据