4.7 Article

Use of fish liver PLHC-1 cells and zebrafish embryos in cytotoxicity assays

期刊

METHODS
卷 35, 期 2, 页码 176-187

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2004.08.009

关键词

heat shock proteins; cytotoxicity assays; PLHC-1 cells; zebrafish; embryos; cadmium; cellular stress response

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heat shock proteins (HSPs) indicate exposure to cellular stress and adverse cellular effects, thus serving as biomarkers of these effects. The highly conserved Hsp70 proteins are expressed under proteotoxic conditions, whereas small HSPs are expressed in response to stressors acting on the cytoskeleton and cell signaling pathways. Poecilopsis lucida hepatocellular carcinoma line 1 (PLHC-1) cells have been used extensively for studying effects of cytotoxicity. A number of assays have been developed to examine DNA levels, protein levels, growth rate, morphological changes, and viability. The boundary between sub-lethal and lethal effects of particular stressors has been determined. The methodology and analytical framework for these techniques along with sample assays using cadmium stressed PLHC-1 cells are described. A range of methodologies have been developed in the past decade that allow the analysis and interpretation of gene expression and function in vivo in zebrafish embryos, and many of these are now being applied to the development of embryotoxicity assays. Here we provide the theoretical background and methodology for utilizing Hsp70 expression as an indicator of toxicity in the zebrafish embryo. Hsp70 expression is activated in a tissue-specific manner in zebrafish larvae following exposure to a number of different toxicants, including cadmium. This has allowed the development of an hs70leGFP reporter gene system in stable transgenic zebrafish that serves as a reliable yet extremely quick indicator of cell-specific toxicity in the context of the multicellular, living embryo. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据