4.7 Article

Foxd1-dependent signals control cellularity in the renal capsule, a structure required for normal renal development

期刊

DEVELOPMENT
卷 132, 期 3, 页码 529-539

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/dev.01604

关键词

Foxd1; Bmp4; Smad1; fused kidneys; renal capsule; mouse

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK061459-05, R01 DK061459-09, R01 DK061459-07, R01 DK061459, F32 DK10072, R01 DK061459-08, R01 DK061459-04, R01 DK061459-06, R01 DK061459-07S1, R56 DK082963-01, R56 DK082963, 5T32 DK07328] Funding Source: Medline
  2. PHS HHS [R01 61459.01] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Development of the metanephric kidney involves the establishment of discrete zones of induction and differentiation that are crucial to the future radial patterning of the organ. Genetic deletion of the forkhead transcription factor, Foxd1, results in striking renal abnormalities, including the loss of these discrete zones and pelvic fused kidneys. We have investigated the molecular and cellular basis of the kidney phenotypes displayed by Foxd1-null embryos and report here that they are likely to be caused by a failure in the correct formation of the renal capsule. Unlike the single layer of Foxd1-positive stroma that comprises the normal renal capsule, the mutant capsule contains heterogeneous layers of cells, including Bmp4-expressing cells, which induce ectopic phospho-Smad1 signaling in nephron progenitors. This mis-signaling disrupts their early patterning, which, in turn, causes mispatterning of the ureteric tree, while delaying and disorganizing nephrogenesis. In addition, the defects in capsule formation prevent the kidneys from detaching from the body wall, thus explaining their fusion and pelvic location. For the first time, functions have been ascribed to the renal capsule that include delineation of the organ and acting as a barrier to inappropriate exogenous signals, while providing a source of endogenous signals that are crucial to the establishment of the correct zones of induction and differentiation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据